The city is out $900,000 a year – oh look! The Nature Center owes us $800,000! Problem solved!

Tomorrow night,  the city is poised to do two completely contrary things: first they will vote to collect $900,000-plus a year off taxpayers by RAISING YOUR UTILITY TAX, saying they are broke and need the money to pay salaries. Then they will turn around and hand it to the Chico Creek Nature Center.

Okay,  it’s not THAT simple, but you can follow along. See, over 5 years ago, the city made a deal with Tom Haithcock and Dave Guzzetti and John Merz to loan the Nature Center, a PAC run by the aforementioned people and their friends, EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS to build the Taj Majal in the Park – a new “learning center” to which only Nature Center personnel hold the key. This building is not even open to the public. It is used by the NC to run a “school” by which they also suck in a good hundred grand a year, by my estimates. They’ve never been asked to show their books.

In addition, we taxpayers have been paying Haithcock’s $50,000+ salary and benefits  all these years with Community Block Grant Funding money.  This is the same pot they take out of to pay for garbage like “Artoberfest”. 

Well, the city started to cut the grant funding – down from $60-something-thousand to about $42,000 a year. So, Haithcock was faced with fundraising his own salary – like every other “non-profit” – or he could quit. If you know Haitcock, you were not surprised when he quit. He tried to go out like the Lorax, but when he stamped his foot, he just ended up standing there looking like a big spoiled brat.

Well, they hired a new front for their operation – Courtney Farrell – who is going before the council tomorrow night to ask that the loan payments be deferred, AGAIN. In the five or so years since they took $800,000 from the city pot, they have not paid one red cent, not principle or interest. But every year they take CBGF money to pay their director, because they can’t get enough support in the community to pay her salary. And benefits, yeah, she gets benefits. You pay for it.

I took my kids to the Nature Center “camp” before Haithcock took over – it was nice but not really worth the $50/week for  a half-day price tag. A full day was $80/week. That was over 10 years ago. Now they charge $135 for a week!

 Those camps were full, and in passing, I see they still get plenty of kids. But they are not being asked to present these figures – Haithcock got away with a hastily scrawled list of half-baked figures – and in his case, I think the word “baked” is applicable – he was just handing them amounts, I wonder if he even knew exactly how much the center was taking in and how much it was spending.  Nobody pressed him for his tax filings or anything like that. He just made the shit up and handed it over, and they patted him on the head and handed him 10’s of thousands of your money. 

So, here we go again. They want to raise your phone bill to hand money to their friends. 


4 thoughts on “The city is out $900,000 a year – oh look! The Nature Center owes us $800,000! Problem solved!

  1. If these do gooder ideas are so good and if they can fill their “camp” why is it always necessary to stick the taxpayer with millions of dollars in costs? Over the years that is what it will cost.

    If this is such a good idea why can’t it stand on its own feet in the market? And if it can’t fund itself why can’t the difference be made up with donations?

    Why do things like this always turn into a feeding trough for the politically connected and become a political football?

    The only thing certain is that our taxes are going up (if these thieves get their way) and no matter how much they take it will never be enough.

    Every time they get more tax money it only encourages them to increase pay, pensions and benefits of the bureaucrats, and it only encourages them to start new programs that we can’t afford.

      • Feel free to use anything I say whenever you want such as in letters, at the city council meetings, etc. And that goes for anyone else reading this.

      • Thanks Bob, I hope some people will come down tonight and make these points:

        1) this is a poor tax on a life necessity – phones are NOT A LUXURY. People need phones to be connected to jobs and other resources these days. Telling a prospective employer you don’t have a phone or a car is like saying, “I don’t really want a job.” Placing a tax on an item people need to live is an onerous burden – robbing the poor to feed the rich, as far as I’m concerned.

        2) we can do more to cut salaries – instead they lay off employees and cut services but still expect us to PAY MORE. The city attorney who wrote this initiative makes over $200,000 a year in salary and her benefits package costs over $90,000 a year. She will retire soon, at 70 percent of that salary – we are not willing to pay any more taxes to foot her lifestyle. We need to rewrite these contracts, and they’re all coming up over the next 6 to 8 months. We need to tell these “public servants” they can take a pay cut or take the door. This is our legal right, but the council needs to be pushed to do it.

        We don’t need to raise taxes, we need to make further cuts. They act like they’ve already made cuts – nope, they left curtains of fat, still needing a trim. Our city is obese, a BIG FAT LOSER, and we need to put $taff in the sweat box until they take it off, take it off, take it ALL off.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s